An Anglers view from Mike Grief (RFERAC)

SOME ANGLERS  are concerned about the format of the proposed new byelaws particularly as to the removal of fish. We hope you agree with us and will support our actions by replying to the consultative document.  Our concern is that the legal removal of zander from the Fens will have a dramatic effect on fishing in the Fens as we know it. Remember when zander were introduced resulting in a predator imbalance, do we want to see our good fishing damaged again. 

I Believe that zander should be on Schedule 1 of the new byelaws and be protected as a "native" species. WHY?

They were legally introduced by the then EA and after 50 years are in our opinion now "native" and part of the ecology of the river.

To remove them could have dire consequences, perhaps not, but can we afford to take that risk. ie the zander was originally stocked by a public body and therefore have received "official" backing. 

Should zander not be on schedule 1 the fish stealers and poachers will have a fine time, “legally” removing zander, whilst our rivers suffer a decline. 

The Fens attract local and visiting anglers providing outstanding sport for both the predator and silver fish angler. 

The rivers are fishing as well as they have ever done but the possible changes to the byelaws allowing for more fish to be removed puts the river/drain fishing in jeopardy, which will drive more anglers from the rivers and tourists from the Fens.

We ask that the Marine Bill be used to protect the Fens and our fishing not assist in their decline.  The Byelaws have been debated in various committees that I am a member of and the response from this region has consistently been that the “new” byelaws will still allow easy fish removal and course fish should not be removed.